Posts Tagged ‘Hillary Clinton’

Weekend Edition: Benghazi, the Truth and Men of Honor

Saturday, September 6th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on September 6, 2014 at 3:42 am

par 1Among the many REAL issues that we, as Conservatives, Tea Publicans and Republicans must put front and center for the 2014 midterm elections, right along with Obamacare, the IRS targeting, the NSA spying, our economy and the most disastrous foreign policy imaginable..is Benghazi.

The interview Bret Baier of Fox News did with three of the CIA ops who were ON THE GROUND…IN BENGHAZI that night, September 11th, 2012, was THE most telling of any interview done so far.

Critics will gnash their teeth…claiming that all they’re trying to do is sell a book. Yes, there is a book, “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi” written by Mitchell Zockoff along with the security team from Benghazi but these three…Kris (“Tanto”) Paronto,  Mark (“Oz”) Geist, and John (“Tig”) Tiegen have a lot more to lose than to gain by speaking up.

Under this Obama regime, they’re through. They’re done in the intel community because the truth of what happened there doesn’t match the Obama fabrication of those events.

Not even close.

According to Baier’s interview, those three men, on the CIA security detail in Bengahzi were ready, geared up, armed, ready and calling for close air support to go to the compound, just a mile away, within five minutes of the start of the attack.

Not only did that close air support never come but…Tiegen, Paronto and Geist were told to wait.

That’s right…

READ THE FULL WEEKEND EDITION HERE!!!

Share

Liberals Need to Lobby for a New Hobby

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2014

y Craig Andresen on July 2, 2014 at 4:28 am

hobby 1Man oh MAN…Monday’s Supreme Court decision on the Hobby Lobby case has left liberals, already barely hanging on by the last threads of one screw, completely unhinged.

Not at all surprisingly, the decision went 5-4 but liberals and their ideology that ALL of us should pay for what a FEW want, was struck down and more to the point, it was struck down because of Obamacare and Obama himself were not allowed to force ‘freedom FROM religion’ down We the People’s throats.

Five of the nine Justices agreed that a corporation, owned by those with deeply held religious beliefs could not be forced, upon mandate of government, to abandon those beliefs once they walked outside their doors or the doors of their chosen church.

For once, the Founders and Framers were smiling.

As the Founders and Framers set up our Constitution and specifically, the Bill of Rights, the 1st Amendment guarantees every American Freedom OF Religion. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” and this has today’s liberals all tied up in knots.

For instance…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

Mr. Mayhem’s Magical Legacy

Friday, June 13th, 2014

EdenHeader-Sr edenpoliticalcartoons.comObamaNeverland2-w

Share

Is Benghazi a Made Up Scandal? Skyes the Limit

Thursday, May 8th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on May 8, 2014 at 4:58 am

skyes 1As liberals continue to run scared regarding the truth about the Benghazi attacks, more and more rhetoric from them is flying hither and yawn through social media and their lapdog mainstream media. It’s now to the point that we need to fight back using the facts.

A couple of days ago, I wrote an article,Liberal Benghazi Deniers About to Face the Music that received scorn from the left and I fully expected it would but their counter arguments simply fly in the face of reality.

Wrote Chad Skyes in a comment posted on my article: “First off, I’m 100%, no. I’m 110% positive, that no administration official even knew what had happened in Benghazi for weeks afterwards. The sheer amount of confusion when something like this happens is overwhelming. Even when actual combat units are engaged in a firefight, with all our communications equipment, the information received by higher ups is almost always incorrect and inconsistent. The fog of war is very thick and unless you’ve been there like I have.. your opinions are worthless. “

“What followed politically was your typical PR campaign. It wouldn’t have mattered who was in office, Republicans, Democrats, none of that matters. The PR machine does it’s thing regardless of who is in power. We can point to complacency, mismanagement, lack of funding, lack of security, blow back from our foreign policy. We could go on and on pointing the finger.. the reality is war is hell and people die.. period. “

“Instead of wasting tax payer dollars on this made up scandal, why are we not focusing on the REAL SCANDALS??”

Mr. Skyes is 100%, no…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

Beware the Royal Spawn of Chelsea

Monday, April 28th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on April 28, 2014 at 4:53 am

YIKESPoor Barack Hussein Obama.

At some point in the future when he becomes a grandparent, nobody in the media will be able to gush over his being our nation’s first black presidential grandchild.

How sad.

First of all, that honor should go to Thomas Jefferson citing his affair with Sally Hemings, a Monticello slave at the time and DNA evidence compiled in 1998 regarding the fact that Heming’s youngest son, Eston Hemings, shared male ancestry with our third president.

While that has been disputed by some, there can be NO dispute over who our first black president was.

One, pasty white, Bill Clinton as deemed by the liberal media back in the day and now, with the mainstream media literally OOZING vapidness from every pour regarding the recent news of Chelsea Clinton’s impending birth canal expulsion, any future Obama offspring would come in a distant third but, while on the topic…

The child of Chelsea may well not even be the 2nd black presidential grandspawn given Horny Bill’s propensity to be as monogamous as a rabbit on Viagra in a hutch full of hot=to-trot bunnies regardless of his poor aim in relation to his presidential humidor, Monica Lewinski.

There could well be more Clinton offspring out there of child bearing age for all we know.

Now, I know there are some out there who believe, perhaps with some validity, that the Obama’s adopted but…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

A Bridge Too Far or…Revenge of the Turds?

Monday, January 13th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on January 13, 2014 at 5:27 am

Regardless of WHO was behind it and, regardless of WHY…

The great New Jersey Bridge Scandal of 2013-2014 was meant to do one thing and one thing only.

Ruin Chris Christie.

Let’s get one thing straight…I am not a fan of the RINO. No fan at all and, regardless of what I believe about Christie and his support of things liberal, Muslim and borderline socialistic…His love affair with the GOP and the way the GOP has embraced him and all but bestowed upon him the 2016 nomination…

There is something I do NOT believe and that, is that Chris Christie had any prior knowledge of the closure of lanes on the George Washington Bridge last September and I have even less belief that those closures had one single thing to do with “revenge” over a Mayor who wouldn’t endorse him in his second campaign for the Governorship of New Jersey.

The guy won and won in a landslide.

Chris Christie had no need of the endorsement from the Mayor of Ft. Lee.

None whatsoever.

If one is seeking “revenge” for the lack of a political endorsement…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.2

Sunday, January 5th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on January 5, 2014 at 5:13 am

In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.

I also kicked down the door as to who would have HAD to be involved, why and to what ends.

I went so far as to expose the preemptive nature behind the cover story AND the actions of 8 Democrats in the house.

If you missed it…Have a look at the truly disgusting nature of those who would conspire, collude, commit and cover up acts of TREASON.

But, I said there was more and, there is.

To truly delve into the desperate nature of liberals, Obama, his administration, Hillary and the New York Times…One must fully realize how far the Times is willing to go and why.

Last week, The NY Times released an editorial regarding Benghazi and that You Tube video ass covering story stating: “Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

The Times didn’t stop there.

Oh…SOMEBODY is TRULY desperate…

Last Thursday, they actually made a claim SO outrageous, SO absurd, that it defies common sense and DEFINES desperation.

As their latest effort at providing some sort of “reasonable” doubt for any upcoming trial of either Hillary, Obama or BOTH was falling apart due to REAL FACTS garnered from SWORN TESTIMONY provided by CIA BENGHAZI SURVIVORS behind the closed doors of the house oversight committee…

READ THE FULL WEEKEND EDITION HERE!!!

Share

Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.1

Saturday, January 4th, 2014

By Craig Andresen on January 4, 2014 at 4:09 am

Last week, the New York Times garnered publicity by trying to claim that the 9-11-2012 attacks in Benghazi really WERE because of an obtuse, low budget, You Tube video that, essentially, nobody saw.

The fallout was decisive from their inopportune editorial.

Members of congress from both parties quickly derided the opinion piece as bunk, citing evidence gathered via sources under oath from house and senate hearings that pointed directly toward al Qaeda and their affiliate, Ansar al Sharia…al Qaeda by another name.

Many called the NYT piece what it was.

Cover for Hillary’s 2016 ambitions but…

I contend there is more to it than that.

Much more to it than that.

Before I delve into what that much more is, we need to take a quick look at the claims made in the Times.

First…

Here is the direct quote from David D. Kirkpatrick of the Times in that piece:

READ THE FULL WEEKEND EDITION HERE!!!

Share

In Spotlight of Truth – Liberals Running From Their Own Shadows

Thursday, November 14th, 2013

By Craig Andresen on November 14, 2013 at 5:11 am

Liberals and socialists in congress are lining up against their Dictator because they know they don’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell in the 2014 midterms if they don’t.

They are desperate to be seen as standing AGAINST Obamacare…Now…But they and ONLY they voted FOR Obamacare.

That is a matter of RECORD that cannot be run away from.

Bill Clinton came out and called for changing the law to allow people to keep their previously existing insurance because HE’S trying to provide distance for Hillary’s run in 2016 but…

HE is on record of being Obama’s Obamacare MOUTHPIECE in the 2012 campaign and SHE is on record too.

Here’s Bill as late as September 4th…3 weeks before the roll out of Obamacare:

“We need all hands on deck here. The health of our people, the security and stability of our families and the strength of our economy are all riding on getting health care reform right and doing it well. That means we have to do it together.”

And about 4 weeks AFTER the roll out?

“The computer deal will get fixed up. Don’t worry about that, But our side, we’re not so ideological,” said Clinton. “So, instead of bashing them and screaming about how incompetent they were, most of our people just tried to help people understand the law and make it work and then wait for it to get fixed.”

“There’s a big difference in being an ideologue and being practical, putting people first as opposed to some abstract philosophy first.”

On September 13th, just 2 weeks before the Obamacare roll out, HILLARY Clinton stated:

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

Benghazi: Witnesses to Treason Set to Testify

Wednesday, November 6th, 2013

By Craig Andresen on November 6, 2013 at 5:35 am

To be completely candid, there aren’t very many Members of Congress that I, or anyone for that matter, trust but, Trey Gowdy is one of the handful I would trust 24/7 365.

Gowdy is an exceptional representative to his constituents and were all congressmen and women the caliber of Trey Gowdy, this nation would be in fine shape.

According to Gowdy, the Obama administration has been changing the names…Providing aliases, to the survivors of Benghazi.

Gowdy would not make such a claim were there no evidence to back it up.

Gowdy recently told The Blaze: “Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”

Indeed, Trey Gowdy has questions, lots of them, for the long hidden away Benghazi survivors but, he has a few rather common sense questions for the media as well.

“Does it bother you whether or not you know why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi?”

“Do you know why we were the last flag flying in Benghazi after the British had left and the Red Cross had been bombed? Do you know why requests for additional security were denied?”

Those survivors, most of them CIA agents who were on the ground IN Benghazi nearly 15 months ago have reportedly been threatened by the Obama administration including the CA, the Justice Department and the State Department.

According to white house court jester, Jay Carney:

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Share

Videos, Slideshows and Podcasts by Cincopa Wordpress Plugin