Headlines
News-Image

Help Us By Checking Out Our Sponsors

Read More

Newsmax: Hot Headlines

Read More

Progressives & The Continued Urban Slaughter

Read More

An Oligarchy and Not a Republic? No Kidding?

Read More
News-Image

Help Us By Checking Out Our Sponsors

Published By: All Right Magazine on October 6, 2013

Posted in: Uncategorized | Comments Off

Newsmax: Hot Headlines

Published By: All Right Magazine on August 20, 2013

<div id=”nmWidgetContainer” data-client=”689″></div>

<script src=”http://cdn.nmcdn.us/js/connect.js”></script>

<script type=”text/javascript”>

NM.init({ClientID: 689});

</script>

Posted in: Politics | Comments Off

Progressives & The Continued Urban Slaughter

Published By: fsalvato on April 23, 2014

Over the Easter weekend, the City of Chicago experienced a rash of violence that eclipsed anything taking place on the battlefields of Afghanistan or in the uncivilized Taliban-held territories of Pakistan’s border region. 18 people were shot in several incidents, 13 of them dying from their wounds. This is nothing new to Chicago where for years the annual body-count has rivaled, if not exceeded, the casualties reported from war zones in which our military have been engaged. What is new is the political leadership in that city.

Those familiar with Chicago will take issue with that last statement, but the fact of the matter is this. It is true. While the City of Chicago has been staunchly Democrat for decades, its new mayor, Rahm Emanuel, former Chief of Staff to President Barack Obama, is a Progressive. Where the Daleys (both Richard J. and Richard M.) displayed a sincere love for the city, Mr. Emanuel, by all accounts, sees it as a stepping-stone to either the political throne of “king-maker” or executive branch national office…perhaps both.

I can say with confidence, having spent a majority of my lifetime in the nearby suburbs of Chicago, that the Daleys understood that the mean streets of Chicago were just that: mean streets. To that end, while they saw the value in efforts to address the social issues contributing to the modern urban culture of urban violence, they also knew full well that a strong, effective and empowered law enforcement community, coupled with a citizenry supportive of personal responsibility, was necessary to execute the most important role of any chief executive – local, state of federal: the protection of the innocent.

Progressives have, for decades now, fomented a culture of victimization. Everyone is a victim. Where non-Progressives see the innocents affected by those perpetrating violence-as-a-culture to be the victims, Progressives include the perpetrators of said violence as victims as well. Progressives see the people who load the gun, carry the gun and illegally shoot the gun – killing innocents, along with those complicit – as victims: victims of circumstance; victims of culture; victims of social and economic “injustice”; victims of society.

The Progressives’ answer to the modern day urban culture of violence is to create more community assistance, more community activities, and more community engagement. But while a fraction of those embracing the urban culture of violence would benefit from (or even engage in) the existence of these programs, the overwhelming number of those who embrace this culture not only know no other way, but see the lifestyle as glamorous, and who could blame them?

Black urban youth – and to a lesser extent but no less troubling, Latino, Asian and White urban youth – have come to see the urban culture of violence as a lifestyle “choice” (ironic that Progressives are all universally “pro-choice”). The urban youth culture is rife with violence; violence in its music, in its preferred art and entertainment, and in its counter-culture economic system. You can’t go a quarter-hour listening to an urban radio station without hearing lyrics about killing police officers or rival gang-bangers, or lyrics about women being treated like whores; to be used for sex, with those arguably degraded women being painted as accepting it willingly because, hey, it’s all about the money.

And when it all boils down to it, isn’t that the truth? In a culture where our education system is more worried about instilling a false sense of self-esteem (no one is a loser, everyone is a winner; everyone gets a trophy) than in cultivating critical thinking skills, complete with lessons on how to learn and then capitalize from failures, haven’t Progressives really trained an entire generation – if not two – to take the easy way out; that they are entitled to “the good life”; that it’s okay to transgress the law because it is the “victim” inside of you that moves you to do the unlawful? Using the victim-mentality Progressive mindset, who in their right mind would work a degrading minimum wage job for $7.25 an hour ($290 for a 40 hour week) when selling cocaine for a drug gang can garner that same person 10 times that amount in a night?

Mr. Emanuel took to the airwaves after the weekend’s carnage and expressed anger at the violence. That’s where he and I agree. I, too, am angry at the violence. He acknowledged that community engagement programs are necessary. To a certain extent I agree.

But he also sees the issue as one facilitated by the existence of guns. It is with this mentality that I disagree, and vehemently.

For some bizarre reason, Progressives, including Mr. Emanuel, think – and it really is bizarre – that outlawing weapons will somehow keep the criminals from illegally attaining weapons. The stupidity of that argument is stunning. If someone is going to break the law by murdering someone, why would a gun law restrain them from acquiring a weapon? Additionally, study after study after study, based on law enforcement data; prove beyond any doubt that crime – even urban crime – is reduced in areas where lawful concealed carry gun laws exist.

To express my argument more bluntly let’s do an experiment. Load a weapon and place it on the table. If you want to be daring, point the barrel of the weapon in your direction. Now, step back ten feet and command the weapon, “Shoot me!” I am going to bet the farm that nothing happens; that the weapon itself did not, of its own power, shoot you. This very basic experiment proves this thesis: Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

I will acquiesce to Progressives if they acquiesce to the rest of us (compromise is what the Framers intended for our system of government). I will sign on to community engagement programs for what they are worth in providing safe haven and deterrent to inner-city innocents and vulnerable youth, but only if Progressives cease with the stupidity of :

▪ instilling the falsely elevated self-esteem brainwashing they push in our schools;

▪ the ridiculous notion that inanimate objects kill people;

▪ their tacit support of the urban culture of violence as “cool”;

▪ their neutering of law enforcement’s capability to affect the carnage produced by violent gang crime before it occurs, and their ability to meet criminal force with overwhelming force in the name of serving the law-abiding public.

I would see this as a good trade-off, given the fact that employing this compromise has a better chance to immediately save lives in our urban areas than anything the Progressive victimization culture has ever come up with.

That said, I won’t hold my breath waiting for Mr. Emanuel and his brethren Progressives – including the race merchants among them – to announce their willingness to engage in something so common sense. Progressives, after all, know what’s best for all of us…always.

Posted in: Constitution, Politics, Race in America, Red/Blue Divide, Socialists and Communists | Comments (0)

An Oligarchy and Not a Republic? No Kidding?

Published By: fsalvato on April 21, 2014

The Washington Times is reporting that a study by Princeton and Northwestern Universities has determined that the fundamental transformation of the United States of America has already taken place. We have transitioned from a Republic (as our Framers intended) to an oligarchy:

“America is no longer a democracy — never mind the democratic-republic envision by Founding Fathers. Rather, it’s taken a turn down elitist lane and become a country led by a small dominant class comprised of powerful members who exert total control over the general population — an oligarchy, said a new study jointly conducted by Princeton and Northwestern universities.

“One concluding finding in the study: The US government now represents the rich and powerful, not the average citizen, United Press International reported…

“Researchers then concluded that US policies are formed more by special interest groups, than by politicians properly representing the will of the general people, including the lower-income class, UPI said.”

Really? Who would ever have thought?! Oh, that’s right, we “whackoids” and “domestic terrorists” among us; those warning about the encroachment of dominant government into our private lives. We have been (first politely and now with a twinge of anger) voicing this ongoing event for quite a while, first as individuals and now in organized groups.

This is what happens when Progressives capture the message-crafting media. This is what happens when we pass amendments to the US Constitution that destroy the protections built in for the individual States. This is what happens when factions and big money special interest groups reign supreme in Washington, DC. This is what happens when the no- and low-information voters decide elections; our country’s well-being hanging in the balance.

Whether or not it is too late to change anything is a matter of debate. Personally, I am inclined to fight for the country and the capitalist economic system that literally created the first Middle Class ever to exist in the history of man.

To that end, there is an organization that has developed a solution – or at least the vehicle to achieve a solution – for the manipulation of the no- and low-information voters by the special interests and political opportunists currently transforming our Republic; the oligarchs, if you will.

Founders Alliance USA*, a non-partisan group, has developed VoterFYI.

The VoterFYI initiative is for voters (and no- and low-information voters are included here) who are dissatisfied with the current political system and parties. The initiative matches voters to the strongest candidate on any given ballot, whose positions are compatible with the voters’ highest values using machine intelligence. Unlike the position paper model of think tanks, the VoterFYI process is more personalized by leveraging advances in social technology and artificial intelligence to match voters to their candidate, make recommendations on issues based on the data that is input, and save precious time.

Part of the pain of transitioning from the most promising form of government (the American constitutional Republic) to the failed tenets of oligarchical Socialism is the destruction of prosperity; the equalization of society by the denial of opportunity.

There has been very little economic growth for the last five years. The “recovery summer” has come and gone with the worst recovery ever recorded. In 1950, more than 80 percent of all men in the United States had jobs. Today, less than 65 percent of men do. Because they’re feeling acute pain monetarily, the sleeping giant that is “we the people” are waking up to the disparity and recognizing the incompetence of both political parties. It is at this point that Progressives and oligarchic elites intend to swoop in with an expansion of the entitlement state; the nanny state, where government advances to control even more of our lives than it already does.

The brilliance of the VoterFYI project comes in its ability to elevate the issues above the political parties and above the misinformation and deception of the terminal power-seekers. It allows each individual to formulate and refine their understanding of the issues, thus circumventing the Madison Avenue political rhetoric that only well-connected money can buy. Once the populace understands the issues – and how they, themselves, feel about the issues – no intentionally contrived message of spin by either established political camp can deceive the voters any longer…and this includes the no- and low-information voters.

Find out more about VoterFYI by clicking here.

I don’t know about you, but I am unwilling to stand by, doing nothing more than complaining, as Progressives and political opportunists finalize the fundamental transformation of the United States. I am choosing to actually do something about it. How about you?

“The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” ~ Patrick Henry

* In the interest of transparency, the author sits on the board of directors for Founders Alliance USA.

Posted in: Constitution, Politics, Socialists and Communists | Comments (0)

Would We the People Ratify the Constitution Today?

Published By: Dr.RobertOwens on April 21, 2014

We the People are the opening words of the preamble to the Constitution.  Many patriots glory in that name, “We the People” holding it aloft as a banner against the encroachments of an ever expanding central government.   In the minds of many it is connected somehow to Lincoln’s famous description of America’s government, “Of the People, by the people and for the people.”

Both of these were revolutionary terms when first spoken.

The people of the founding generation did not think of themselves as “Americans,” instead they saw themselves as citizens of their respective States.  The thirteen colonies, with the singular exception of North and South Carolina, were each founded as separate entities.  Each had its own history and relationship with the crown.  They banded together for the Revolution during which they established the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation.  This established a confederation composed of thirteen independent States.

When the secretly drafted Constitution was finally revealed to the public many of the leading lights of the Revolution were enraged by what they saw as a counter-revolution seeking to supplant the legally constituted Confederation of States in favor of a consolidated central government.   Some of them say the truth was revealed in the first three words, “We the People.”

Every school child can recite the most famous words of Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty or give me death.”  You probably said those words in your head before you read them once you saw his name.  He is synonymous with America’s defiance to tyranny.  While these famous words ring in the heads of all, few know his opinion on the Constitution.

At the Virginia Ratification Convention in 1788, Patrick Henry said,

And here I would make this inquiry of those worthy characters who composed a part of the late federal Convention. I am sure they were fully impressed with the necessity of forming a great consolidated government, instead of a confederation. That this is a consolidated government is demonstrably clear; and the danger of such a government is, to my mind, very striking. I have the highest veneration for those gentlemen; but, sir, give me leave to demand, What right had they to say, We, the people? My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask, Who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states? States are the characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the states be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great, consolidated, national government, of the people of all the states.

Ever since the Civil War fatally warped the original federal structure and We the People became a reality the central government of the United States has assumed more and more power until today totalitarianism appears to be within its grasp.  I am not referring to the crude overt totalitarianism of a Nazi Germany or a Soviet Russia instead I am referring to a soft totalitarianism, a kind of nanny state smothering of individual freedom, personal liberty and economic opportunity.  After the complete subjugation of the States to the central government by the Lincoln administration combined with the increased mobility of the modern era, we the people actually became the way most people think of themselves.

In America today we have a president who in a 2001 interview expressed his inner most thoughts about the Constitution,

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

That is as clear a statement of the way our Progressive leaders view America’s founding document, a charter of negative liberties.  A charter that they believe needs to be expanded with a second bill of rights first proposed by FDR in his 1944 State of the Union Address,

  1. A realistic tax law—which will tax all unreasonable profits, both individual and corporate, and reduce the ultimate cost of the war to our sons and daughters. The tax bill now under consideration by the Congress does not begin to meet this test.
  2. A continuation of the law for the renegotiation of war contracts—which will prevent exorbitant profits and assure fair prices to the Government. For two long years I have pleaded with the Congress to take undue profits out of war.
  3. A cost of food law—which will enable the Government (a) to place a reasonable floor under the prices the farmer may expect for his production; and (b) to place a ceiling on the prices a consumer will have to pay for the food he buys. This should apply to necessities only; and will require public funds to carry out. It will cost in appropriations about one percent of the present annual cost of the war.
  4. Early reenactment of the stabilization statute of October, 1942. This expires June 30, 1944, and if it is not extended well in advance, the country might just as well expect price chaos by summer. We cannot have stabilization by wishful thinking. We must take positive action to maintain the integrity of the American dollar.
  5. A national service law—which, for the duration of the war, will prevent strikes, and, with certain appropriate exceptions, will make available for war production or for any other essential services every able-bodied adult in this Nation.

According to Cass R. Sunstein, the former administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, President Obama not only believes in FDR’s Second Bill of Rights he seeks to implement them,

As the actions of his first term made clear, and as his second inaugural address declared, President Barack Obama is committed to a distinctive vision of American government. It emphasizes the importance of free enterprise, and firmly rejects “equality of result,” but it is simultaneously committed to ensuring both fair opportunity and decent security for all.

In these respects, Obama is updating Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Second Bill of Rights.

We are in the grip of the Federalists on steroids bent on redistributing their way to total power.  The question before us today is, “Would we the people ratify the Constitution today?”

Even Conservatives believe in a safety net.  Everyone contributes to and hopes to receive from Social Security.  No one wants people dying in the streets because they can’t get medical care so Medicaid is available to the uninsured.  Of course Medicare is considered a right for anyone over 65.  Unemployment is an accepted part of the safety net as are food stamps.  If you add up what is already accepted and expected then throw Obamacare into the mix and you see we have become a society addicted to entitlements all of which would fail the test of a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

The 10th Amendment says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  The power to do any of these entitlements is not delegated anywhere in the document as it is written, only as it is interpreted.

So would we the people ratify the Constitution as it is written today?  I think not.  A living document has turned the Constitution into a dead letter and the entitlements we have all accepted have turned the descendants of the Founders, Framers, and Pioneers into supplicants standing before the federal throne waiting for a check.

Only a re-birth of self-reliance, a renaissance of historical perspective and renewed political activity have a chance to bring about a rebirth of liberty in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Keep the faith.  Keep the peace.  We shall overcome.

Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion.  He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2014 Contact Dr. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com  Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens

 

 

Posted in: Constitution | Comments (0)

Easter and Prophecy – The Resurrection You Will Believe

Published By: dolran on April 19, 2014

tn_Calvary_2Approaching Easter, it is apparent that each celebration of Christ’s resurrection from now on, has more significance than at any other time in history. The reason is simple; what is known as the “first resurrection” (Rev 20: 5, 6) is according to prophecy not very far away.

Yes, this writer is aware of the pagan roots of the holiday we now call Easter, but we are addressing the heart of the matter here, not the misguided perception. The heart is resurrection, nothing more.

What Easter is Not!

People who only darken the door of the church on Christmas and Easter are not likely to have any knowledge of how these holy days really came about and if they were to ask, they would most likely get a standard religious answer based on that church’s view, rather than a scripturally based explanation.

If the resurrection was only meant to signify the coming of spring, new life, the joy of rabbits and Easter eggs, or even the beauty of orchids, lilies and flowers it would make Christ’s death on the cross a rather foolish act. It would be an object lesson that reaches to the furthest corners of goofy to extract a lesson. Without the clarifying light of scripture such a celebration would become ersatz – or is it too late already, has perception already overtaken reality?

Resurrection of Christ – A Promise and a Stamp of Approval

Christ’s resurrection, rather than merely being a cause to celebrate spring, is a promise that one day we will all be resurrected. When Jesus used ‘verily verily’ to precede a statement it was a signal to take heed. It was fair warning that the truth within his declaration was a surety not a wistful or pious platitude open to many interpretations and debate. One such declaration was his promise that one day; we will all see our own resurrection.

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.” (Jn 5: 25)

When the lepers, the blind and every kind of disease was healed during Christ’s public ministry it was to verify his deity. It was proof to a dying world that they were witnessing the works of the Creator and Master of Life. The final verification, his resurrection, was the capstone and full stamp of approval from God the Father that Jesus was indeed his only begotten son.

In reality, God did not approve Jesus because he was resurrected, but rather his approval came because Christ – is the resurrection.

“Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again. Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.” (Jn 11: 23-25)

The Resurrection and Prophecy – Inextricably Entwined

Prophecy contains pictures of future events, the last day’s falling away, the coming of Antichrist, the destruction of Muslim invading armies on the plains and hills of Israel and much more. The promise of a resurrection for every person who has ever lived is also a prophetic declaration, but it stands in a place quite apart from all other prophecy because we are given a pre-view and an actual demonstration of it, in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

It is a prophecy and a promise with teeth – no one will escape its bite.

Christ’s Resurrection – Not the Last One this World Sees!

Who would guess that the scripture provides an entire chapter in Revelation (Rev 11: 1f) for those who are doubtful of Christ’s resurrection which is a promise of a last days, last minute double resurrection just before terrible judgments begin on a global scale. Not only do the two servants who preach the gospel during the reign of Antichrist get resurrected, but accordingly, it is an event seen around the world.

Prior to these days of instant global communications this prophecy was very difficult for expositors of the scripture to explain.

The two “witnesses” described in Revelation eleven will shake up the world with yet one more resurrection. It will cause many to turn away from Antichrist and it is the mercy of a Living God given as the last herald to the living. It is a reiteration of Christ’s resurrection in full color, worldwide and spectacular. It is proof that God does not like sneaking up on an unsuspecting creation just to lower the boom, without mitigation and mercy.

Two Resurrections? – Yes, but Let’s Not Get Confused

It is not confusing, the Bible teaches that at the second coming of Christ there is a resurrection of the just. Those who will ultimately be judged into punishment are not resurrected until the one thousand year rule of Christ (The Millennial Kingdom) is completed.

“But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.” (Rev 20: 5, 6)

It is this scripture and others like it that have given birth to the old adage “born once, die twice – born twice, die once.” Jesus said we must be “born again” to see the kingdom of God. (Jn 3: 3) Quite simply it is only those who have accepted the re-birth that are resurrected at the second coming of Christ.

The Resurrection No One Wants to Attend!

The second death is a resurrection at the end of Christ’s millennial kingdom and those who are found there are from every walk in life. No stature or rank is recognized whether prophet or president, rich man or poor.

It is the final dark day in which separation from God becomes permanent for millions. It is a resurrection of the hopeless and it will include every kind of sinner and mocker that time has ever produced. It is the one resurrection that you will not want to attend.

In one of the last chapters of the entire bible this last warning is given to wit:

“But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” (Rev 21: 8)

Changing the Terminology – Not Enough

Many churches and individuals have begun to call Easter “Resurrection Day” rather than trying to explain the derivation of the word Easter. Even this is not enough. A better plan would be to acquaint yourself with the next two resurrections and adjust the path of your life to accommodate that knowledge.

With that accomplished no one will have to wish you either a happy Resurrection Day or a happy Easter. It will be the happiest day of your life. This is the prophetic promise of Christ’s resurrection.

“For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God”

George Frederick Handel extracted from – Job 19: 25, 26

First published in American Prophet.org March 27, 2013

Michael Bresciani is the publisher of American Prophet.org since 2005. The website features the articles and reports of Rev Bresciani along with some of America’s best writers and journalists, news and reviews that have earned the site the title of – The Website for Insight. Millions have read his timely reports and articles in online journals and print publications across the nation and the globe. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Posted in: Religion | Comments (0)

Daletoon of the Day: Committee on Un-Obama Opinions

Published By: All Right Magazine on April 15, 2014

By DALE

 

.

DAle-Un-American Activities

 

DALE is a cartoonist on a mission hailing from northern Virginia, within sniffing distance of Congress. Following in the footsteps of Ronald Reagan, he believes that “If you can’t make them see the light, make them feel the heat.” His work can be seen at http://daletoons.blogspot.com/. Whether it be through stunning art or biting humor, Dale’s work takes shots at those in power and powerful ideas.

Posted in: Political Cartoons | Comments (0)

Comically Incorrect: Acts of Love and Taxes

Published By: All Right Magazine on April 15, 2014

By A.F. BRANCO

af-501_c4.

- Cartoon: Tax-Exempt Delays

AF-JebLove

http://comicallyincorrect.com/2014/04/11/act-of-love/

 



@afbranco

I sit somewhere between the Far Side and the Right Side of every issue as the Featured Conservative Political Cartoonist@CDNnow and @BoldSpicyNews .

Posted in: Race in America | Comments (0)

Was stopping Nevada’s fracking rush behind the Bundy Showdown?

Published By: StridentConservative on April 15, 2014

Marita Noon 2013 greyThe story of rancher Cliven Bundy has captured an abundance of media attention and attracted supporters from across the West, who relate to the struggle against the federal management of lands. Bundy’s sister, Susan, was asked: “Who’s behind the uproar?” She blamed the Sierra Club, then Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), and then President Obama. She concluded her comments with: “It’s all about control”—a sentiment that is frequently expressed regarding actions taken in response to some endangered-species claim.

An Associated Press report describes Bundy’s battle this way: “The current showdown pits rancher Cliven Bundy’s claims of ancestral rights to graze his cows on open range against federal claims that the cattle are trespassing on arid and fragile habitat of the endangered desert tortoise.”

Bundy’s story has been percolating for decades—leaving people to question why now. The pundits are, perhaps, missing the real motive. To discover it, you have to dig deep under the surface of the story, below the surface of the earth. I posit: it is all about oil and gas.

On April 10, the Natural News Network posted this: “BLM fracking racket exposed! Armed siege and cattle theft from Bundy ranch really about fracking leases.” It states: “a Natural News investigation has found that BLM is actually in the business of raking in millions of dollars by leasing Nevada lands to energy companies that engage in fracking operations.”

 

Read the rest at The Strident Conservative

Posted in: Energy, Environment, Life in America, Politics | Comments (0)

Texas Drifter: Commie Greenies an Endangered Species?

Published By: Texas Drifter on April 15, 2014

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Marxist-fascists radical environmentalists better known as “commie greenies” should go curl up in some out of way corner. Why, U.S. Constitution makes you ignorant, willingly stupid, mean spirited, or just plain evil people America’s new endangered species.

Needed brutal truth for commie greenies; there is an undeniable difference between empirical notes about naturalist studies which involve in to scientific conclusions; and Marxist-fascist- propaganda based on scientific fraud to promote unconstitutional crimes and other tyrannies which violate all laws.

Repetition is good training tool there are two types of laws: “spirit of law” also called natural law and sometimes scientific laws; and two, “word of law”.

Examples of “spirit of law” includes: Ten Commandments; 1581 Act of Abjuration, and Declaration of Independence. Examples of “word of law” includes: common law; U.S. Constitution; Bill of Rights.

Since “spirit of law” always has been, still is, and always will be; can one conclude that “spirit of law” supersedes “word of law” as final authority? Texas Drifter thinks answer is yes without a doubt.

People react to law in several ways
1. Those who abide by law
2. Those who try to abide by law
3. Those who do not abide by the law because of ignorance, moral laziness, or rabid vices
4. Those with rabid souls who are just plain evil much like evil among us in U.S.

Preliminary examples of “commie greenie” global warming or climate change law breakers:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who may be genetically defined as Satan’s spiritual children

Excerpt: Article I Section 8 United States Constitution – To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And … (end excerpt)

Constitution was written by citizen “Framers” representing all types of careers using a writing style that could be understood by all citizens not “legalize” that only lawyers and judges could understand. Both America’s “Founders and Framers” knew what grazing land and parks were.

Reader is asked to show Texas Drifter the constitutional amendment that includes grazing lands and parks in above list from Constitution’s “word of law” specifics: … to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; …

One can make valid argument that “other needful buildings” does not include grazing lands or federal parks. Seems that one can also present an argument that properties not listed in above specifics; are unconstitutional acquisitions plus, it is an unlawful act for federal government to possess such properties. Consequently all such properties should be returned to States and private citizens.

Since re-cycling is current fad in America, Texas Drifter will re-cycle excerpt of Citizens Passions Entry # 328 Texas Drifter: America Needs Garage Sale – April 21, 2011.

Marshall’s Law Dateline – America needs to follow example of working class Americans resolving their financial problems when their credit ratings are in jeopardy: cut expenses; have garage sale; find part time jobs.

America’s Garage Sale discussion shall start with following

1. Return all unconstitutionally held property by federal government to States
2. Lease off shore mineral rights for extraction with bonds to cover extraction damages and insure environment returned to original state.
3. “Illegal” lands still possessed by federal government shall be returned by auctions to original stewards of land private property owners
4. Al sales will be contingent on cash, municipal bonds, or pre-approved lines of credit.
5. Some Properties shall be sold by sections to provide middle class citizens opportunity to participate in America’s Garage Sale with deeded access easements guaranteed to prevent some unethical capitalists from denying middle class property owners access to their land.
6. Only American citizens can participate in America’s garage sale with attempted purchases by foreign nationals, foreign businesses, or foreign governments resulting in administrative forfeiture of funds used to perpetuate scam.
7. All proceeds go ONLY to pay off America’s national debts.
8. Since Marxist-fascist non-profits have no problem with IRS going after conservatives and conservative organizations; “greenie” non-profits and corporate fascist “invisible legal individuals” representing corporations will all be excluded from participating in “America’s Garage Sale” of lands forfeited by federal government for engaging in criminal conduct against U.S. Constitution and American citizens.

Best part of America’s Garage sale, after federal government returns illegally possessed properties to States and new owners. Services of bureaucrats at agencies like BLM, Interior, EPA, Agriculture, and related agencies reader can list; will have opportunities to pursue careers in fast food restaurants.

Brief brutal truth: America’s federal courts have become Gestapo like enforcers for non-legislated bureaucrat regulations not federal courts honoring their oaths to uphold, protect and defend. Be not surprised when federal public bureaucrats who are not elected unaccountable tyrants receive aid and comfort from federal courts.

Time has arrived for Americans to start discussions about conservation basics like those penned by Texas Drifter – Written years before published during 2008 at Citizens Passions Continue Plus Entry # 105 “Conservative Environmental Standards”.

Reader should thank, not express dislike for Texas Drifter suggesting that the time has arrived; for America’s federal government to get out of, and away from unconstitutional land stealing policies and practices. Also “commie greenies” should not expect much sympathy for their worshiping and following false prophets like Gore and Obama.

Reader should spread message that “word of law” always prevails over actions of law breakers like:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who are probably genetically Satan’s spiritual children
TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Why, remember adage: As it is written in Constitution and Bill of Rights; so shall it be enforced.

Bonus question – Commie Greenies Endangered Species; depends on loyalty of Americans to “spiritual law” and “word of law” – TRUE or FALSE

 

Posted in: Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Videos, Slideshows and Podcasts by Cincopa Wordpress Plugin